ChrisKeymasterFebruary 23, 2021 at 7:42 pmPost count: 309
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided NOT to hear a number of the cases on voter and election fraud.
The Supreme Court threw out a series of legal challenges on Feb. 22 to voting processes and results in several states left over from the recent presidential election cycle.
The high court didn’t explain why it refused to hear the cases, but three justices dissented from the decision not to hear one of the cases from Pennsylvania.
Justices Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the Supreme Court’s decision not to hear the appeal.
On Feb. 22, Alito wrote in his dissent, joined by Gorsuch, that the case presents “an important and recurring constitutional question: whether the Elections or Electors Clauses of the United States Constitution … are violated when a state court holds that a state constitutional provision overrides a state statute governing the manner in which a federal election is to be conducted. That question has divided the lower courts, and our review at this time would be greatly beneficial.”
In his dissent, Thomas expressed frustration, writing that the court “failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections.”
Read the articles:
Supreme Court Dismisses Slew of 2020 Presidential Election Lawsuits
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote:
Our refusal to do so by hearing these cases is befuddling. There is a clear split on an issue of such great importance that both sides previously asked us to grant certiorari. And there is no dispute that the claim is sufficiently meritorious to warrant review. By voting to grant emergency relief in October, four Justices made clear that they think petitioners are likely to prevail. Despite pressing for review in October, respondents now ask us not to grant certiorari because they think the cases are moot. That argument fails.
One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us. I respectfully dissent.
Read Thomas’s full dissent: Justice Clarence Thomas’s BLISTERING Dissent of SCOTUS Denial of Pennsylvania Election Lawsuit
“Last night Sidney Powell posted a response to the news saying ‘irrefutable proof is coming soon.'”
“Powell told her supporters she will not let the fraud stand!”
Attorney Sidney Powell posted the following on Telegram late on Monday night.
Thank you all! There are still important live cases. Irrefutable proof is coming soon. Keep educating everyone about the facts. Today’s Supreme Court orders were disappointing but we are NOT done, and we will not let this fraud stand. #WeThePeople are supposed to run this country. Our new SuperPAC should be up tomorrow.
It’s to amplify the voice of #WeThePeople across the country. We intend to expose corruption in both parties and support people with the courage to protect our constitutional rights and the Rule of Law. Sign up for updates. Join for as little as $10 a year. Contributors of $200 a year total or less are confidential.
TODAY IN HISTORY – February 23, 1846:
The Liberty Bell tolls for the last time, to mark George Washington’s birthday (on February 22, 1732).
The Liberty Bell bears a timeless message: “Proclaim Liberty Throughout All the Land Unto All the Inhabitants thereof.”
cindyParticipantFebruary 24, 2021 at 1:18 amPost count: 73
The decision of the Supreme Court justices to not hear the election fraud cases makes the strategy of President Trump become more clear. The amount of attention given to Brett Cavanaugh and Amy Coney Barret has a double meaning. President Trump brings people into the center stage for a purpose.
With both of these individuals refusing to hear the election fraud cases we are realizing the true nature of these judges. We are witnessing evil and allegiance be exposed. It is obvious that Kavanaugh and Barret are compromised individuals even though they appear perfect citizens on the surface. President Trump was drawing attention to these two individuals and we are going to find out soon enough what the double meaning might be.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.